The article is a piece of well structured news. It points out the problem-urban heat island first and then puts forward the solution- roof gardens. At the beginning, the journalist Peter Ker gives a specific example: the temperature of the “Tuesday”. He also quotes Professor Nigel Tapper’s words “Think how poor the productivity of Melbourne would have on Tuesday after nobody slept the night before” to prove the fact-hot. In the next paragraph “Tapper is one of many experts convinced that the way we have built modern cities has blunted the natural cooling powers of the night and amplified the heat of the day”, this is how Peter swift the small picture into a big one, and also emphasis the significance of the problem. The facts are all demonstrated by experts’ words, which also strengths the article’s reliability.
Considering the newsworthy, we can definitely see importance, proximity and conflict here. It is a piece of local news reveals how people build roof garden, benefiting in not environment but also economy. It cools the suburb and also gaining profits by growing plants.
The news is narrative and also flows of logic. The photo on the topic of the page gives the readers a picture of roof garden. What’s more, we can see photovoltaic panels beside the garden. How green it is! The photo exactly delivers the theme of climate change which resulted from human activities and the application of renewable energy and substantial development. Basically it is a piece of soft news which full of experts’ words, kind of one-side news.
Move on the news if you have interest:
http://www.theage.com.au/environment/roof-gardens-to-have-their-time-in-the-sun-20100115-mckc.html
